VCHA’s KG Lawsuit Against JYP: What It Means for K-pop Contracts

Published February 24, 2025
VCHA’s KG has made headlines after filing a lawsuit against JYP Entertainment in February, potentially explaining the group’s inactivity. The lawsuit raises significant questions about K-pop contracts, particularly for minors, and whether this case is about advocating for fair contracts or simply an attempt to be released from JYP.
The Key Allegations

KG, a 17-year-old minor, claims that JYP failed to meet basic labor rights, including:
Unpaid wages and recoupable expenses: KG was promised a base salary, but hidden clauses allegedly made her responsible for repaying it.
Forced group housing: While the contract stated that group living was optional, KG claims she was pressured into it. The members were also allegedly saddled with debt due to a luxury home purchased by JYP.
Excessive work hours: KG’s schedule reportedly ran from 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM, even on school days, with limited rest.
Harsh training conditions: She alleges she was denied water during practice and was forced to work through injuries, leading to a torn shoulder tendon.
Weight control and psychological stress: KG claims JYP staff pressured her to lose weight and that another member even attempted to take her own life.
Unfair contract terms: The contract allegedly gave JYP full control over her social media, work opportunities, and even her assigned “personality” within the group.
K-pop vs. Western Contracts: How Do They Compare?
Some aspects of KG’s contract are standard in both K-pop and Western entertainment. For example:
Recoupable expenses: In Hollywood, artists often receive advances that must be repaid before they start earning profits.
Perpetual rights: Contracts often include terms like “exclusive, perpetual right throughout the universe” for an artist’s likeness and work, which is standard in the industry.
Strict management control: Many K-pop and Western entertainment contracts give companies control over branding, marketing, and public image.
However, the lawsuit highlights specific concerns about minors in the industry. Some argue that minors should have an easier path to terminating contracts, as they may not fully understand the long-term implications when signing.
Is This About Fair Contracts or an Exit Strategy?
While the lawsuit sheds light on serious labor concerns, some question whether it’s truly about industry reform or a personal attempt to break free from JYP.

Regardless of KG’s motivations, her case is fueling broader discussions on K-pop’s contractual ethics, especially for young trainees. If KG wins, it could set a precedent for fairer contracts in both K-pop and Western entertainment. Companies might rethink signing minors or adjust